Jump to content


Photo

If I knew then what I know now


  • Please log in to reply
3 replies to this topic

#1 Dhar

Dhar

    Animation Fundamentalist

  • A:M User
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3569 posts
  • Dhar
  • San Francisco, Ca.
  • Mac/Win

Posted 30 December 2007 - 05:18 PM

Remember the Tinwoodman scenes where he's chopping wood and when he's chopping branches etc..? Well, here is a Tip from Shawn Kelly's blog on Animation Mentor that I wish I had known then:

TIP #16: Constrain TO Props, Not To The Character!*

So, if you're animating characters, there's a decent chance that at some point, someone is going to ask your character to interact with something. He'll need to hold a broom, or she'll need to hold a sword, or whatever it is.

The natural inclination of the beginning animator is to constrain that prop to your character's hand, and then as you animate your character's hand, the prop will go along with it.

With some exceptions, this is generally a big mistake, and if you care about arcs at all, will often lead to some big headaches.

Now, I'm going to just assume that you're using IK (inverse kinematics) on the arms rather than FK (forward kinematics), even though I know that some of you probably DO use FK. Personally, I hate using FK on the arms, as I feel like it creates a lot of counter-animation work for me. I know some of you love it, but we'll just have to agree to disagree here.

If you really have to use FK on your arms, then you'll probably have to constrain the prop to your character's hand, and that's that. If so, you might as well save yourself some time and move along. Hopefully the Disneyland story was enough to feel like you didn't get ripped off this month, and I'll see ya next time!

Ok, you IKers still with me? Let's get back to our regularly scheduled program:

So.... why on Earth would it be a bad idea to constrain a prop to a hand?

Well, the biggest problems arise when you have a large or long prop.
Let's say it's a sword, for example.

If you constrain a sword to your character's hand, you will have a fine time blocking things in, and everything will be fine. At first. But if you are animating a sword, you know that you need to make sure that the tip of that sword is traveling along nice figure 8's and smooth swirling arcs (the only exception is when it makes contact with something. No matter what!), so after your blocking is done, you'll eventually need to go in there and track your arcs on the tip of that sword, right?

Well, if the sword movement is based on the rotation of your character's wrist, you've just created a big pile of unnecessary work for yourself.

Why?

Well, because every little rotation of your wrist will be magnified exponentially in the position of the tip of that sword. It's so far away from the wrist that a 5 degree rotation will suddenly have the tip of your sword a foot or more out of place! Editing this in a way that doesn't make the hand look stiff and/or jittery is very time-consuming.


Posted Image


Additionally, if you're using IK, the angle of wrist is very likely being affected by the translation of the elbow controller (or arm twist attribute), and is probably also subtly affected by the movement of the shoulders. Normally, this is great, and helps keep your animation feeling connected throughout the arms, but if you're trying to have finite control over the angle of the wrist, it can be a real bear to edit in the curves, because suddenly the angle of the wrist is being affected by 3 different things, and you're trying to fix curves on three objects that are all affecting each other! In other words, it's a pain in the butt!

A far better method is to switch those constraints around, and block things in where the sword is the thing being animated, and the arms are "along for the ride." You constrain the hand TO the sword, and THEN you dive into your blocking. Of course, you'll have to be vigilant to make sure that your timing and poses indicate the body and arms are moving the sword, and you'll have to be careful to avoid that "IK" look, as you would in any shot.

(uh oh - here comes a tangent:)

If you are new to IK in general, there will be a tendency for your animation to look like the wrist is moving the arm around, because that's the way the model is chained. Your job as the animator is to make sure that it looks like the shoulder is moving the arm, and the arm is moving the wrist - not the other way around. If you are doing proper planning, and have spent time focused on body mechanics (weight, force, anticipation, all that good stuff), then this shouldn't be much of a problem, and you'll be blocking in your key poses and breakdowns just as you would with FK.

In other words, a well animated FK scene should look EXACTLY like a well-animated IK scene, because both should be using the same poses and timing - you're simply using different controls to get them there.

Anyway, the point is, if you animate the prop rather than the hand, you will always have a far easier time creating nice organic arcs and a more pleasing realistic motion. You'll have far more control, and have to take much less aspirin during the polishing phase of your scene.

One caveat to that is if you have a small prop, such as a pencil or something that wouldn't take the strength of the wrist to move. In that case, I'd recommend constraining the pencil TO the hand, rather than the other way around. The fingers will be doing far more of the work, in that case, and the arcs of the pencil will likely have little to do with the arcs of the hand...
http://www.youtube.com/DharrJJ

Dhar's blog




"Technology doesn't make the motion picture, people do. You're not an animator just because you can move an object from point A to point B. (You're) someone who breathes life into a character, which is something the software and technology can't give you."

- John Lasseter

#2 Rodney

Rodney

    A:M Bot 14309

  • Admin
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6899 posts
  • Rodney Baker
  • *Admin*
  • Illinois (not Japan)
  • subscriber
  • Windows

Posted 30 December 2007 - 05:23 PM

That is an excellent tip. Thanks Dhar!
A good idea is a seed, not a solution or
"You can lead horses to water but they still will not animate feature films."
See my effort to think about the art of animation at: My Blog
Want to learn A:M? Start TaoA:M

#3 brainmuffin

brainmuffin

    Fear Ye Not The Null & Bones!

  • A:M User
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 657 posts
  • Lazlo Luongo
  • Orbiting the star Sol @ 90 mi/sec.
  • Windows

Posted 31 December 2007 - 06:01 PM

I could have told you that! Sorry that I wasn't paying attention. I've been kinda out of it...


"Reasonable men adapt themselves to the world. Unreasonable men adapt the world to themselves. That's why all progress depends on unreasonable men." - George Bernard Shaw

If you give a man fire he'll be warm for a day. If you light a man on fire he'll be warm for the rest of his life.

#4 satyajit2000

satyajit2000

    Craftsman

  • A:M User
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 251 posts
  • Satyajit Chakraborty
  • Calcutta, India
  • Windows

Posted 05 January 2008 - 02:27 AM

Red has something to say to you Dhar.

Listen


The project owes you.

Satyajit
My Webpage
The Revenge of Red Riding Hood PLOG

"arise, awake, and don't stop till the goal is reached"




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users