Is anyone else having a problem trying to go to A:M reports? I get "website can not be found" error.

Same here.

Hmm, I wonder what's up with that?

It seems that the bug tracker is on vacation atm.
Should we just email to AM or start bug threads here?

If you need bugs reported, prolly send them to support at hash dot com or stefen at hash dot com

I'm not sure why A:M reports is down or how long it'll be before it up again but please don't post bug threads in the forum.
Forum guidelines don't allow them to be posted here.

If A:M Reports will be down for an extensive time period we'll look into other solutions.

This has been down for a week now, what's going on? Is Hash/Steffen no longer fixing bugs?

I think we've just arrived at the holidays.
(Thats the time each year bug fixers get a few hours off)

bad shot

since the 24. (my first christmas holiday) I have spend each day upto 10 hours for bugfixing .....
(okay it's a very nasty bug , which occurs in the debug version first after 1 hour rendering .... (in the release after 10 minutes ...))


I don't also know exactly , why reports is offline , but I assume Jason merges the both database (in the past , there was a database at www.hash.com and another at www2.hash.com , not compatible)

You have my greatful appreciation Steffen.
Take good care of youself.

We should get Scrooge to give Steffen some extra coal.

Hey, go easy on me!
I plan to update my second websubscription next month.
Until then... Bah Hum-bug!

I feel for you Steffen. I've had problems where the bug would occur only in the release version, and not the debug! That was a huge pain in the butt! Turned out, it was how Microsoft decided they wanted to optimize the code for the release version versus the debug version.

Al

debug heap ? , I'm running in this too some times , but's here not the cause .

Another problem , where i'm running into today (or how to make the programmers life complicated ...).
After two hours of searching a new introduced bug, and short before to kick off my machine out off the window , I found my mistake ...


What was wrong with this code (for non programmer's ...)

line 3 should be a comparision , not a assignment ....

It is a little comforting to know that even a raging genius like Yoda sometimes overlooks the simple things.
Maybe there is hope for me after all!

It should read:

If (binnode == new_binnode) {

shouldn't it? A rooky mistake (just kidding) .

I'm no programmer but was forced to learn how to read code (not interpret it) as my many contract programmers of the past tried to tell me they had no errors in their code by showing me their code and explain their way through it....

By the way Steffen, would it help if each time AM (OSX version) crashed I cut and pasted the pages of 'debug' stuff generated by OSX and bundled that into a Report along with the action I performed rather than just assume it is the same problem each time and just provide a description of what I was doing?

Cheers

It should be?:



Probably not though.....I'm no programmer. I'm just an artist grateful for them. Don't be too hard on yourself. Artists mistakes are glaring but yours hide under a bushel driving your to insanity.

bin there, DUN that.

I think that's a design flaw in the whole language, to make two different operations look so similar. Flash Actionscript has that dumbness too, although you can still use the original "EQ" instead of "==".

On the other hand I'm surprised someone hasn't made a compiler or a code editor that flags instances of a single "=" after an "if" as a possible error.

In both C# and Java, that would have been a syntax error and would not have compiled -- an "if" condition must be a boolean. Is there a way to turn on a compiler warning for that kind of thing?

PHP would have done the operation (so assign the new value to the variable) and if that would be successful (which usually is) the if-statement would be true.
I dont remember what java would have done...

*Fuchur*