Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: TWO "3D World" Articles
Hash, Inc. Forums > Featured > Feature Films: Tin Woodman of Oz - Scarecrow of Oz > Scarecrow of Oz > SO:General Discussion
martin
These aren't the exact articles that were printed because oftentimes changes occured and I didn't receive a proof after the change but these are pretty close to the articles as printed:

Part I: Click to view attachment
Part II: Click to view attachment
Part III: Click to view attachment
Part IV: Click to view attachment
Part V:
Click to view attachmentClick to view attachment

Part VI:Click to view attachment
MJL
Great articles, Martin.

In the captions there was a link to a WIKI to watch the animatics. I went there but things wouldn't load. Is there somewhere else I could watch these? (I'm not entirely sure exactly what animatics are.) I would like to see as much of TWO as possible, just to get up to speed for a better understanding of what's happening in regards to SO. I've been telling friends about the movies and their first response is usually: "Where and how & when can I see them?" So far I have had no real answer.
Concept: Scarecrow singing Gangsta Rap? laugh.gif (Just kidding. Blubbity is beginning to take form conceptually though)
thekamps
TDW94 (part 3) wasn't in issue 94 or 96, 97, or 98.
So I'm guessing it was in issue 95 because that is the one issue I can't find at the moment wink.gif
If no one else puts up the missing articles and I run across a scanner, I'll post them.
apprentice
These articles are fantastic. They're very inspiring. Thank you for sharing your experience.
Rodney
QUOTE
In the captions there was a link to a WIKI to watch the animatics. I went there but things wouldn't load. Is there somewhere else I could watch these?


Somewhere in mid production the wiki changed servers so the wiki URL address in 3D World got broke.
The wiki is still there however. Check it out!

http://wiki.hash.com/index.php?title=Main_Page_Two

I'll have to check to see if the animatics are still linked.
Edit: No, the wiki links to the old mirror site which is no longer in operation. Still a lot of things to see on the wiki including links to much of the film as .MOV files.
KenH
I've scanned issue 100 if you want it.
spacecomics
QUOTE(martin @ Sep 5 2008, 06:20 AM) *
... (In fact, if you've got issues 100 & 101 would you give it to me, please?)



I have an extra copy of 101 so I could mail that, or scan it, if you want.
martin
QUOTE(spacecomics @ Sep 7 2008, 01:39 PM) *
QUOTE(martin @ Sep 5 2008, 06:20 AM) *
... (In fact, if you've got issues 100 & 101 would you give it to me, please?)
I have an extra copy of 101 so I could mail that, or scan it, if you want.

I'd like a copy for my library, so mail it, please. (I'll trade you a "HASH" t-shirt.)
PF_Mark
I have 86,90,92,93,94,95,99,100

# 86 has the 1st mention of TWO on page# 019


#90 has After the gold rush which mentions TWO in it.

#92 has TWO diary #1

#93 has TWO diary # 2

# 94 I bought by mistake?

#95 has TWO diary # 3

#99 has TWO diary # 4

#100 has TWO diary #5

So that leaves me missing a hard copy of # 6 I see if I can still get that? but thanks for the digital ver!

If I have anything you need just ask I post scanned versions
robcat2075
I noticed this little quote from the "Gold Rush" article:

QUOTE
"Nine out of ten CG movies feature talking animals." say Robert Rhodin, "With Astrid Silverlock we've produced something different."


Judging from the picture, they've made a movie featuring talking humans. How novel!
mouseman
That was a fun read! (Although I should have been working on music ...)

Questions about SO compared to TWO ...

1. We're not using DotProject, right? It looks like the status reports are where things are being tracked.

2. We're not using the Wiki, right? It looks like Celtx takes the role of much (but not all) of what was on the Wiki for TWO.

3. Is there a name for the studio / production company?
PF_Mark
QUOTE(mouseman @ Sep 8 2008, 10:29 PM) *
That was a fun read! (Although I should have been working on music ...)

Questions about SO compared to TWO ...

1. We're not using DotProject, right? It looks like the status reports are where things are being tracked.

2. We're not using the Wiki, right? It looks like Celtx takes the role of much (but not all) of what was on the Wiki for TWO.

3. Is there a name for the studio / production company?


1. appears that we are not but not sure

2. I have not seen one for SO so I guess not

3. AM films was on TWO poster so I guess that is what we are biggrin.gif
martin
QUOTE(spacecomics @ Sep 7 2008, 01:39 PM) *
QUOTE(martin @ Sep 5 2008, 06:20 AM) *
... (In fact, if you've got issues 100 & 101 would you give it to me, please?)
I have an extra copy of 101 so I could mail that, or scan it, if you want.

Got it! Thanks, Roger!

Anybody got issue 100 (Part V) they could send me, please?
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2012 Invision Power Services, Inc.